Welcome to Brads 911 Investigation, Pentagon WTC Photo and Video Analysis !
This site is moving to
please update your links !
The page is meant for the reader to come to their own conclusion, though I may make comments, these are just some ideas I believe should be investigated more in depth by our own Government.
A note about conspiracy theories...
href="http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/06-10-04/discussion.cgi.14.html">9/11 War Games - No Coincidence
Ashcroft decided not to take a commercial jet due to security concerns on a report from July 2001Why was a private plane owned by Warren Buffet near flight 93?
Did Maj. Rick Gibney shoot down F93?
911 Redux: American Airlines Flight 11, Reexamined
Joint Chiefs Rejected "Airplanes as Missiles" Scenario 5 Months prior to 9/11
The 911 "Truth" Movement on The Airforce Standown & WarGames
New confusion about AA77
Last week, the 9/11 commission claimed, that Lt. Col. Steve O'Brien, a
C-130 pilot from that morning of Sep11th,
claimed, he spotted the Boeing 757, and later reported, that it "crashed
into the Pentagon". There is only one problem.
O'Brien would have been 17 miles away from Flight 93 when it crashed,
and also followed and seen American flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
other grounded flights
Flight 77 - Transcript
New Meacher: The 9/11 Pakistan connection
There is evidence of foreign intelligence backing for the 9/11 hijackers.
Why is the US government so keen to cover it up?
All 911 updates from INN globalfreeepress.
Pressing Question that could end all conspiracy theories (or prove them)
There were several calls that day reportedly from cell phones and seat back phones.
It is possible from these calls to determine the EXACT place each plane was at any given time. This could end several discrepancies as to what time flight 77 hit the Pentagon
(the time varies depending on what source you read).
It could give the EXACT path of all flights, as the transpoder codes were turned off, this has been somewhat of a grey area, especially for flights 93 and 77.
Most phones toiday are of the technology CDMA. In this technology the cell phone may "talk" to several gound stations (cell sites) at one time. Using triangulation, these calls can be pinpointed. With several calls happening at different times, this could provide very useful info.
It must be noted here, that the calls themselves are not recorded, but the time stamp, date, phone #, and electronic serial number (or ESN) of the phone is (for billing and other purposes).
This applies to CDMA phones (the most common in the US), but also applies to many other types. I do not know if the same applies to the seatback phones or not, but I would imagine that something similar is in place.
The calls information (for cell phones) are required by the FCC to be backed up, or reside in the "switch" at a local office for 3-5 years. (I forget the exact time, i believe the FCC may have changed it lately).
This could be a major breaking point in finding out what happened.
It would end discrepancies and theories such as plane swapping, remote control and the idea that some of the calls were faked or did not happen.
I urge that the info of these calls be released to the general public.
Simplified sites to show the major problems of the idea that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
Mike J Wilson did a great job with the graphics here though its a pro-boeing site.
here is my site with his graphics and my interpretation.
Is this the perp?
Notice the curvature?
Not the size of a 757?
Many other pics with the SAME CURVATURE on this site....
Hi res image here...
Extreme close-ups of the pentagon wall, debris on the lawn,
different angles, the generator and the burned tree.
Close-ups of the lawn, wide angles, enhanced pics, close-ups of the red fire truck that was pumping water, then later was hauled off for being damaged so badly. Several pics of the cars in different positions. Extreme enhanced close-ups of the cable reels before the wall collapsed.
Close ups of the wall and lawn damage before and after the wall collapse at the pentagon.
Extreme close-ups and enhanced images of debris in the impact area.
Closeups of the generator. was it moved during the night?
Is the scar on top of the generator seen in the first photos?
Comparisons of wall structure, the Purdue Simulation, Boeing Specs,
Government reports and photos of actual damage.
Specs on the Boeing 757-200 in relation to the wing tip height and height of the poles which were damaged.
Still photos from the Perdue simulations in contrast with photos of the wall column damage.
High res images and arial views of the Pentagon, Naval annex, surrounding areas, and trajectory of attack.
Photo analysis of discrepancies of the damage to the Pentagon wall columns.
Photos of debris and engine parts from the Pentagon and the WTC - great debris page...
Is this part of a 757 engine?
Small Turbine Disc -Pt.2
more Pentagon debris...
photos and graphics showing the "letter" piece of debris found on the Pentagon lawn.
The most convincing evidence in my mind that there was no Boeing that hit the Pentagon, is on this page. It shows several pics prior to, and just after the collapse of the wall. I can see no plane. Planes this size do not simply disappear. The official story from our Government says that the right wing hit above ground, higher than the left wing. If this were true, the main damage from the right wing should have been to the second story of the building. the pics tell a different story. The main damage to the right of the hole was at ground level and the main support columns which were damaged seem to be pushed OUT not in.
( does not support netscape )
Many of the photos on the web of the Pentagon are dark and blurry. I attempted to enhance some of the here.
An enhanced photo of the main explosion shows the Pentagon wall and a central explosion. Even in this enhanced view - mid explosion, one cannot see anything that resembles a plane. The enhanced views also show how small the hole was and the lack of damage to the wall before collapse.
The cable reels which were in front of the impact area, seemed not to have been damaged at all. If the plane came in at an angle, as most believe, these reels should have been demolished.
The impact on the building in pre-collapse photos show that the damage was done at ground level.
The bottom floor shows support structures that appear to be bulging outward instead of inward which they should . Something had to cause these support columns to bulge outward.
This page shows the exit holes at the Pentagon.
size and analysis of the exit hole here...
Large photo enhancements of the Tom Horan pics, and other similar pics, showing discrepancies of where the impact was, the immediate damage, timeline of particular damage, and an odd piece of debris.
Penta cars and fire trucks.
Many of the vehicles and other debris were seen wandering around the yard.
The cars appear to have been moved, why ? were they moved back again into the damage for a photo-op ?Why ?
There were many curious things that were photographed at the Pentagon that day. There were at least 2 cars in the area of the explosion. It appears these cars were moved, possibly for safety, or to get the fire trucks in place, but it also appears that one car may have even been "swapped out" for some reason. The page shows inconsistencies with the photos taken at different times during that day.
(It also provides a little humor)
This page shows the fire truck that was parked at the Pentagon near the initial explosion. The truck is seen in different places, being used to spray water on the fire in some pics, on fire itself I others. One pic shows the truck being hauled off. If the truck took so much damage then how was it operable? This is also the truck that was reportedly used to shield several people who saw the plane coming in.
One point I think is interesting is that the initial placement of the truck was against the Pentagon wall. This would have shadowed the blast shown in the parking lot cam frames. One of those frames show clearly the blast between the tower and the Pentagon wall. The only other way to explain the parking lot photo is to say that the truck was engulfed in flames, but if that was so, the people using the truck for cover would also have been engulfed in flames and there was no report of that.
Was the cab that was hit by the falling light pole, was it moved ? Different views...
supporting that the cab may have been moved...
pole and taxi closeups...
Pentagon CCTV Gate Photos - Fake ?
There were reportedly 5 images released to the press.
Comparisons of different pics of the CCTV frames taken from the gate video.
Taken from a video at CNN website.
discussion and comments here...
More links on the CCTV video at the Pentagon...
Flight 77 Dulles gate security video (closeups)
German Officials Claim- The FBI told them a Missile hit the Pentagon !
After looking at thousnds of pictures over 2 years, I have become suspect of either image or video fakery, or both. Many of the pics and videos of the plane just before hitting the South tower just dont seem to add up. Keep in mind, that most of these were not taken at the same exact place or angle, and the page is not intended to be scientific proof of anything, but it still proves interesting. Perhaps there are a few altered photos out there?
More south tower images of the plane just before imapct.
Several different angles taken of the pane just before impact with the South tower
( does not support netscape )
Closeups of the plane entering the building
oddities of the angle of smoke prior to the 2nd plane hitting the tower.
The Miracle Zoom-Out
Flight 175 anomaly, the Boeing buldge.
The "POD" has been a BIG contraversy.
Many sites talk about it, but few have enhanced pics for the average reader to see.
On request, I obtained the best video I could and did a frame by frame analysis using filters and changing the contrast and gamma levels. The site is not intended to steer the reader, but to give the best stills of this video.
(some new pics, stills, and repeat pics as well, since the original POD site has bandwith problems)
(High quality enhanced stills)
This site goes into detail showing the difference in the paint job, which should have shown a bright white stripe down the middle of the bottom of this plane (for a standard 767UA plane). all of the pics that day seem to show something different.
(there is also a lot of great info about the Pentagon and the building collapses)
an interesting closeup !
612ua.0catch.com/ (related to the above site)
New news from the anomaly on flight 175
a new forum at Democratic Undergroundand page about www.amics21.com
discussing previously unseen video (NEW?) of flight 175 just before hitting the tower.
interestingly, the stills are on the this NIST .pdf link (appendixh.pdf)
The new stills were done by Scott Myers who also did a review for Final Cut Pro ,
a program that just happens to be capable of making an overlay (like the "building")
and running prepared frames behind it. it seems he was also a JFK researcher,
who's specialty was making digital simulations (thanks to the Webfairy for this)
analysis here as well...
Boeing does not clear up the enigma of the second plane
(old planebomb or POD site)
Closeup of what appears to be a missile being fired before hitting the WTC...
note: this MAY be a ghost from the next frame in the series,
if you look closely, you can see a ghost just above and below the white part in front of the plane.
Good thread here about the possibility of a missile launching just before the plane strikes the building.
WHY? So there would be no evidence left, of the plane?? (which may not have been flight 175?)
North Tower flight 11
New from Marcus.
My new closeups of the first tower strike.
Marcus' previous page... anaysis of the 767 or whatzit.
Photoshop overlays of post damage photos
in reference to the video taken of the North tower impact.
closeups of the North tower imapct from the video.
(this is one of the first sites I made, and is poor quality compared to some of the newer sites,
but i will leave it up for reference purpose)
more closeups of the North tower imapct from the video.
Comparisons of the wall damage and plane images,
with help from Marcus...
North tower images.
NEW pedestrian reaction to FIRST hit
NEW Commentary on Naudet 911 By Ray Ubinger
great first hit analysis from the webfairy
New photos of debris, several differnt angles and closeups of the engine.
all debris photos i could find from the WTC planes
Photoshop overlay of the wall damage vs the FEMA report.
aslso overlays with the video stills.
Closeup pics to the wall damage of the WTC's from different angles.
( does not support netscape )
Other pics of the wall and damage...
( does not support netscape )
The FEMA report shows little damage to the structures of the WTC's.
This page shows the damage stated by the report side by side with photos of the real damage.
Decide for yourself if it is accurate.
( does not support netscape )
The 2 videos show that there may have been an explosion several floors above the impact of the plane!
This has serious implications that either a missile struck, or a bomb went off.
The plane hit between the 94th and 98th floors according to the FEMA report. This explosion was between the 106th and 110th floors.
(There was a report and video showing that the bottom floors of the North tower (lobby area) was badly damaged. Windows were blown out. It has been commented that the fuel from the plane came down the elevator shafts and exploded on the bottom floor. The problem with this being that there is no 1 elevator shaft that went from the ground floor to the floors hit by the plane.
( does not support netscape )
This page shows stills from 2 videos. One shows the 2nd impact from a side view.
The wings should have sheared off since this plane came in at an angle, Tip to tip the wings would have spanned several floors and the continuous floor structure would have presented a great resistance to the wings staying intact with the fuselage. Since the gas tanks on a Boeing 767 are on the wings and about 90ft apart from each other, the main explosions should have stayed in the building and not exited the other side. The pics however shows a large explosion and fireball exiting the building.
There were also several large objects exiting the building, one in particular seemed to leave its own fire trail and exited with force. It may be possible it was an engine, but the close-ups indicate otherwise.
This page shows video stills of the 2nd plane exiting the building. A very large object, which at first appears to be the nose of the plane, seems to begin its exit then explode. If the nose of the plane and front part of the fuselage made it through the building without hitting any major support structures, elevator shafts, or going through the floors, then it simply should have exited and fell to the ground. This object seems to have created its own explosion on exit of the building.
WTC building 7, this page also shows projectiles from the 2nd impact of the WTC.
Several of the objects were seen moving toward building 7.
Video stills of what a appear to be exposive charges going off bringing about the collapse of the WTC.
Some pics that appear to be charges going off in the WTC's
Many web pages seem to show the same photos from the WTC over and over again.
There were many photos taken that were not shown because of aesthetics or other reasons.
This page has some pics that have not been and also some oddities that I have found.
Another page of WTC oddities, unexplained objects,
and several photos of the 2nd plane from different angles.
hi-res photos of the building exploding, closeups of the spire,
and what appears to be a missile shooting out of the South tower.
Strange and odd pics from 911.
Some of the objects i call "silver balls" I have identified as helicopters. (some not?)
I am not big on UFO's but there was a report and video that there was a UFO filmed before Sept 11th.
This page shows how that was a complete hoax.
Pics of the helicopters that were around the WTC that day. Extreme closeups.
( This shows that some of the oddites and UFO's were just choppers, though I have found some that were NOT)
Person seen in the hole of the Trade Tower.
See the revealing insurance industry 12 page PDF report at this URL:
Also, the idea of the suns position in relation tto the dhadows of the planes has been a topic...
Mr Grossman addresses this here (and several other problems)...
11. Analyzing The Sun Position At WTC2 (south tower) at 9:03 a.m. on 9-11-1:
Persistent Problems Of The 9-11 Dogma
By Dr. Stefan G. E. Grossmann www.gallerize.com 6-11-4
looking for something?
you can search several 911 sites here by keywords !
(this searches several 911 sites, and many articles as well)
The 911 commission omissions. by Jack Straw
Some feelings about the commission by Andrew here...
Up to date news on Sept 11th investigation.
Physics911 Blogspot (my weblog)
Thanks to my freinds at Globalfreepress
Nico Haupt's page, latest upadtes on 911 news...
All 911 updates from INN globalfreeepress.
Best new Links...
cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline (most complete 911 timeline)
Hon. Cynthia McKinney
Plaguepuppy.net /Plaguepuppy's Video Archive
perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/ Eric Bart
www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/ericbart.htm Eric Bart
www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm Dick Eastman
Air Defenses Stood Down On 911 AFTER ATC Alerts Given
A bi-lingual site reviewing anomalies of the WTC and Pentagon attacks
Is There Evidence That Explosive Charges Were Used To Destroy The World Trade Center Towers?
FSC Statement Regarding the 9/11 Commission’s Hearings
Up to date news on independent investigations into 911
News about 9/11, the Iraq war...
Impeach Bush Links
In New Orleans ?
Greater New Orleans Green Party: Home Page
great new link, this guy thinks like me...
Never cease in the fight for peace, justice, and equality for all people. Be
perisitent in all that you do and don't allow anyone to
sway you from your conscience. ---Leonard Peltier
Disclaimer and Terms of Service
The so-called "Patriot Act" may place important restrictions on freedom of speech in the United States. Nothing on this web site is intended to coercively influence any person or persons or any government, nor should any such construal be encouraged.
Under the Patriot Act, individuals may be placed under electronic surveillance without their knowledge or consent, and without any court order. We have no way of knowing whether this is in fact taking place, and if we did, we would be violating the Patriot Act to specifically notify our readers. We recommend that all our readers assume that they may be under surveillance while surfing the Web or using any form of electronic communication.
The Campaign Finance Reform Act may also restrict freedom of speech under the First Amendment. Nothing on this web site should be construed as a criticism of any particular politician who may be a candidate for re-election. Readers who criticize any candidate should be aware that they may be in violation of the Campaign Finance Reform Act